Monday, January 30, 2012

Uganda: Power crisis weighs down economy

THURSDAY, 19 JANUARY 2012 01:27 WRITTEN BY MOSES TALEMWA



When Parliament’s ad hoc committee probing the energy sector reconvened this week after the Christmas recess, chairman and West Budama South MP Jacob Oboth indicated that they had a tight agenda ahead of them.
The committee plans to meet key government officials and to conclude its report in two weeks. According to Oboth, this report is expected to set the tempo by which the power sector will run, beginning this year. The committee is set to meet key sector ministers, Irene Muloni, Simon D’Ujanga and Hilary Onek, as well as minister of State for Finance Aston Kajara and long-serving permanent secretary Fred Kabagambe Kaliisa. The five are expected to explain the various discrepancies in the sector that led to a crisis, which now makes doing business in Uganda the most expensive in the region.
“We need to get to the bottom of this crisis so that when our report comes out, it is so comprehensive that our groundbreaking resolutions will not be ignored,” Oboth says. The MP has met several groups of players who were involved in the evolution of the sector from 2004, when Umeme first took over from the disbanded Uganda Electricity Board.
Many in the business community are also watching the committee closely to see if its final report will mirror their own findings and concerns.
“We have been doing our own research and we intend to publish our report on January 20 before we call for decisive action,” Issa Sekitto, Kampala City Traders Association spokesperson reveals.
Sekitto says KACITA is convinced the electricity crisis is unsustainable and unnecessary as Uganda is now the most expensive in the region. “As you know most (businesses) start out small and are eventually knocked out by high electricity tariffs or the lack of power,” Sekitto says.
However, Sekitto’s comments couldn’t have come at a worse time. The Electricity Regulatory Authority (ERA) recently issued new tariffs, following government’s decision to withdraw the subsidy on the cost of electricity. The decision effectively increases the cost of power by 70% (from Shs 184.8 to Shs 312 for the large consumers and 38% for the medium scale consumers from Shs 333.2 to Shs 458.9).
Uganda Manufacturers Association members, who are already incensed by the move with some calling for a strike, want a public hearing on the matter as it affects their survival.
“UMA demands an urgent fair hearing by government on this matter that fundamentally affects the present and future members of UMA over and above having far-reaching social economic consequences for Uganda as a whole,” UMA chairman Kaddu Kiberu demanded in a letter on Monday.
At around the same time, the Oboth committee summoned the Electricity Regulatory Authority (ERA) and demanded that it withdraw the new rates, after realizing that, contrary to regular practice, the ERA board had not sat to decide on them.
“We demand that you withdraw these rates or else we shall send the people onto the streets to demonstrate against you,” Kasilo county MP Elijah Okupa said.
ERA executive director Benon Mugisha Mutambi said it was unsustainable to keep the power tariffs at the old rate. Once outside the house, the director for Energy and Mineral Development in the  ministry, Paul Mubiru, weighed in on the matter: “The concerns of the ad hoc committee have been noted but the reality is that the process has already taken place. It is difficult for the committee to change the tariff back because the mandate for this lies with ERA.
The committee can only make recommendations to Parliament which would then discuss them and change them if a resolution is made. But the Electricity Act is clear and makes no provision for tariffs to be taken to Parliament for endorsement.”
Mutambi later added that unlike in the past, ERA would review the tariff once every month from April going forward and the cost of power would not be going down.
“So far there is nothing to show that once Bujagali comes on stream, the cost of power will come down. So, it is unrealistic to expect lower power tariffs,” Mutambi said.
In explaining this, Mutambi says the current power deficit is 172MW, which they hope will be resolved when Bujagali is fully commissioned. But then he expects population growth to have translated into higher demand for power.
Sekitto says the trading community is already fed up and will not hesitate to take action.
“The electricity tariff is unnecessarily high and this must end. We are ready to take to the streets to ensure that our demands are met.,” the KACITA spokesperson said.

Contractual Issues

The ad hoc committee is also already concerned about the contract that brought Umeme into Uganda’s power sector.
“The negotiating team knows very little about the [concession] agreement than those who are now investigating it, and worse still they don’t even recognize that it’s a bad deal that makes the tax payer a prisoner,” Oboth said late last year.
The Auditor General has also raised queries about Umeme’s losses and the level of investment onto the national grid. Under the contract, Umeme is entitled to claim compensation from the government for any losses incurred while conducting business, but the Auditor General doesn’t believe the loss levels are genuine. His appearance before the committee in the coming days will shed light on this.

Power Generation

So far, the committee has discovered that there are serious problems in how power is generated at Jinja. While meeting the director of Water Resources (DWR), Mugisha Shillingi, the parliamentary committee discovered that the country is ill-equipped to monitor the water that goes into the two dams Kiira and Nalubaale to generate power.
“We do not have any staff in Jinja; we only monitor the water that is discharged into the dam by looking at the gauges after Eskom has released the water. To my understanding Eskom uses the water we allow them to use,” Shillingi told the committee.
However, he admitted that the DWR was unable to independently ascertain whether Eskom was following instructions. He explained that from a technical perspective the dams, including the yet-to-be-connected Bujagali hydro power plant are designed to handle 800 cubic metres of water per second. However, the President recently directed Shillingi to increase the water discharge rate to 1,000 cubic metres per second to enable more reliance on hydro power than the more expensive thermal power.
On the thorny issue of whether Bujagali can produce 250MW, Shillingi, said the new plant was designed with a flow of 800 cubic metres per second, and could generate 250MW of power for up to six hours a day, which is when that kind of electricity is usually needed.

mtalemwa@observer.ug

Turkana project to create 2,800 jobs

SATURDAY, 21 JANUARY 2012 00:15 BY JAMES MBUGUA
A massive wind power project in Lake Turkana region will create 2800 jobs over the next 3 years mainly in construction. Carlo Van Wageningen, the chairman of Lake Turkana Power, the consortium that is undertaking the project, yesterday said the 300Megawatt project will see the installation of 365 wind turbines over 40,000 acres.
It will be the largest wind project in the world when completed. “We have to build a village to accommodate all the staff,” Wageningen said at a press briefing in Nairobi. Other projects include the construction of a road that the consortium will undertake, installation of a 105kilometre interconnection between the wind turbines and deployment of static synchronous condensers to stabilize the system.
Wageningen said concurrent construction of a transmission line from the area to Suswa would be carried out by the Kenya Electricity Transmission Company (Ketraco). The wind farm project will cost 583million euros (Sh64billion) while the transmission line will cost 142million euros (Sh15.6billion) for a total of Sh80billion at current exchange rates. “We expect to be online at the end of the last quarter (December) 2013 with 50MW with completion in the last quarter of 2014,” Wageningen said.
He said 70 per cent of the project funding will come from commercial lenders with 30 per cent coming from cash injection by shareholders. “Our lenders are completing the stages to get financial close,” the chairman added. Shareholders include Aldwych which own Rabai power plant (25 per cent), IDC of South Africa (25 per cent), Norfund and Vestas (25 per cent each), Danish IFU (6.25 per cent ) and KPMP (8.75 per cent). Wageningen said Kenya has very good wind with potential for up to 15,000MW in the Lake Turkana/Marsabit region. “This will be the highest load power capacity in the world,” he said.


Courtesy of The Star

Ethiopia planning to carryout feasibility studies on three additional hydropower plants

  JANUARY 30, 2012

"Asfaw Dingamo and Tom Odegaard"
The Mandaya and Beko Abo Dams are situated in the Blue Nile Sub-basin and among the top high dams in the world, respectively having a 200 mts and 285 mts height, an installed capacity of 2000 MW and 2100 MW and an annual energy output of 12,119 GWh/year and 12,600 GWh/year.
Senior ministers at the Ministry of Water & Energy (MoWE) are planning to carryout feasibility studies on three additional hydropower plants to be built in the basin of the Abay (Blue Nile) River, whose combined power generation capacity is projected to be larger than the Grand Renaissance Dam, Fortune learnt.
The cost of the feasibility studies on the technical, environmental, and social impacts of the dams will be covered with a 20.1 million-dollar grant secured from the government of Norway.
Asfaw Dingamo, former minister of Water Resources, had signed the grant agreement with Tom Odegaard, in November 2009.
Hydroelectric power plants planned in Mendaia, Beko Abo, and Kara Dodi, will collectively have 300MW more power than the Grand Renaissance Dam’s 5,200MW, a capacity the dam is believed to have when the Italian Salini Construttori completes construction in the second quarter of 2017. It will be the largest hydropower plant on the continent, with 15 generating units, each producing 350MW of electric power, a capacity currently generated by Koka and Tekeze dams combined.
The Grand Renaissance Dam also symbolises the nation’s determination to build the largest dam ever with its own resources, according to Prime Minister Meles Zenawi.
“The other dams we plan to build are less challenging than this,” he had said during his address at the launching of the project in Guba, Benishangul Gumuz Regional State, on April 2, 2011.
Indeed, he was referring to hydropower projects on the drawing board such as Beko Abo (2,100MW), located two kilometres upstream of Nekemt Bridge; Mendaia (2,000MW), located seven kilometres upstream on the Abay River and Dedessa River confluence; and Kara Dodi (1,600MW), located 70km upstream from the Renaissance Bridge.
However, the actual generation capacity of each dam will have to be determined after the feasibility studies are complete.
“Their capacities might increase or otherwise,” a hydraulic expert at the Ministry told Fortune.
Mendaia and Beko Abo projects are expected to be roller compacted concrete (RCC) dams, with 200 metre and 285 metre heights, making the latter the highest of its type in the world, each having an annual energy output of over 12,000 GWh a year.
The prefeasibility studies on Mendaia and Bako Abo projects were conducted by a consortium of consultants from Norway (Norplan and Norconsult), France (Electricite de France), and England (Scott Wilson), as well as Shebelle Consult Plc and Tropics Consulting Engineers, both domestic firms.
The report for the studies was approved by the Ministry after reviewing reports from the consultants, following consultation with the Ethiopian Electric Power Cooperation (EEPCo) and other relevant stake holders, sources disclosed.
The prefeasibility study includes hydrology studies, topography surveys, and geotechnical foundation and environmental studies. Aside from hydropower generation, the projects also aim to be multipurpose, providing improvements in flood control and conservation.
“The Ministry approved the projects, confirming their economic and technical viability, as eligible for a final feasibility study,” a senior official at the Ministry told Fortune.
Studies on economic and social viability were carried out by foreign consultant: Halcrow and Generation Integrated Rural Development (GIRD). It was during these studies that a helicopter crashed in the Abay Gorge, after it collided with a cable en route from Gojam to Wellega; no harm was reported.
The aforementioned consortium has been given the job of conducting the feasibility studies. They are allowed to take about six months to complete them, according to the senior official at the Ministry.
“If all of the studies are finalised within the year, as planned, construction will start within the coming few years,” he disclosed to Fortune.
The cost of building all three dams is yet to be determined. Nonetheless, it may reach close to 75 billion Br, considering the 13 million Br average cost per megawatt that the five most recent dams, including the Grand Renaissance Dam, have consumed in the past or are projected to.
“By the time we secure financing for their construction, these projects will be ready to be carried out within the five-year transformation period,” said the senior official at the Ministry.
The Ministry is also commissioning economic feasibility studies on the Tekeze River, for its second dam, 903km north of Addis Abeba, and on the Dedessa River, in Benishangul Gumuz, 386km from the capital. The two projects will have an estimated capacity of producing 450MW and 301MW, respectively.
The successful construction of these dams will increase the nation’s hydroelectric power plants to 17.
Currently, EEPCo generates 2,000MW of power, while an additional 8,000MW is expected in the coming three years; of which 97MW has already been added after Fincha Amertinesh Dam, consuming 137.8 million dollars, was inaugurated last month.
source: addis fortune

Friday, January 27, 2012

Zimbabwe Power Demand to Rise 29% in 2012, Supply Authority Says

Zimbabwe Flag By Godfrey Marawanyika
Jan. 3 (Bloomberg) -- Zimbabwe’s electricity demand is projected to increase 29 percent this year, boosted by the mining industry, the state power utility said.
Demand rose 6.2 percent last year from 2010, Fullard Gwasira, a spokesman for the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority, said by phone today from the capital, Harare.
Zesa generates 900 megawatts to 1,200 megawatts compared with demand of 1,900 to 2,200 megawatts. The country imports 35 percent of its electricity from Mozambique and Democratic Republic of Congo, yet fails to meet demand, resulting in almost daily power cuts. Zimbabwe is the third-largest power consumer in sub-Saharan Africa after South Africa and Nigeria, according to the World Bank.
The country’s economy is estimated to expand 9.4 percent in 2012, led by growth in the finance and mining industries, Finance Minister Tendai Biti said on Nov. 24. The economy was forecast to grow 9.3 percent in 2011, with mining output climbing 26 percent as the nation attempts to recover from a decade-long recession that ended in 2009, Biti said.
Zimbabwe Electricity Transmission and Distribution, a unit of Zesa, said power demand by mines in the nation’s northern region is expected to advance 22 percent in 2012.
“Developments in the mining sector include Maranatha Ferrochrome at 13 megavolt amperes, Mazoe gold mine at 5.5 megavolt amperes and RioZim Ltd. at 5 megavolt amperes,” Harare-based ZETDC said in a report handed to Bloomberg News.
Industry, Agriculture Demand
Maranatha is a closely held company. Mazoe is owned by South Africa’s Metallon Corp. while RioZim was once controlled by Rio Tinto Plc.
Demand by the industrial sector is forecast to rise 55 percent while farms will raise demand by 33 percent, ZETDC said.
In the nation’s southern region, the Mimosa mine, owned by Aquarius Platinum Ltd. and Impala Platinum Ltd., plans to start using 15 megavolt amperes, while the Wel mine, owned by Chinese investors, will need 5 megavolt amperes, ZETDC said. Sino- Zimbabwe Ltd. of China is planning an additional 6 megavolt amperes.
--With assistance from Brian Latham in Johannesburg. Editors: Ana Monteiro, Randall Hackley
To contact the reporter on this story: Godfrey Marawanyika in Johannesburg at gmarawanyika@bloomberg.net

China completes cross-border power transmission project with Russia

BEIJING, Jan. 1 (Xinhua) -- State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC), the country's largest power supplier, said Sunday it has put to trial operation a cross-border electricity transmission project in northeastern Heilongjiang province to supply Chinese with Russia's electric power exports.
The electric power SGCC purchased from Russia began reaching Chinese customers late Saturday night after the completion of the direct-current back-to-back networking substation, or called "the trans-Amur project" by Russians, SGCC said in a statement on its website.
The trial operation will last 168 hours, SGCC said in the statement.
With a transmission capacity of 750 mega-watts, the electricity transmission project is China's biggest cross-border power line, according to SGCC.
"The implementation of the project will gain experience for the expansion of Sino-Russian energy cooperation and help promote the economic development for both countries," SGCC said.
The project is also part of the Sino-Russian energy and trade cooperation.
Russian Deputy Energy Minister Andrei Shishkin said in June 2011 that the transmission project would increase Russia's power supply to five or six billion kilowatt hours of electricity to China and Russia intended to increase its electricity supply to China in the coming years.
Russian companies plan export 60 billion kwh of electricity to China by 2020. Power plants will be built along its border with China to reduce power transmission losses and reduce transportation costs.
Also on Sunday, an oil pipeline linking Russia's far east and northeast China witnessed its one year anniversary of operation, as operators announced an accumulated 15 million tonnes of oil had been transported into China in 2011.

Editor:Zhang Pengfei |Source: Xinhua

Links for Ethiopia’s power export plans being put into place

12 January 2012 

The East African Power Pool has been given a boost with the US$41 million 230 kV Ethiopia-Sudan transmission line project that will extend almost 300 km to be finalised in the first quarter of this year. It will enable Ethiopia, which is setting itself up to become a major electricity exporter to the region, to sell up to 100 MW of electricity to Sudan.

The World Bank financed this transmission infrastructure project and Enegroinvest is undertaking the transmission line construction with Sunir doing the substation contract.

Ethiopia also expects to supply Kenya with 400 MW by the end of 2015. The two countries will construct over 1,000 km of transmission lines to interconnect their power grids, with Ethiopia to build 443 km of this total and another 612 km of line to be constructed by Kenya. The electricity transmission link between the two countries will have the capacity to carry 2,000 MW and forms one of the backbone projects of the East African Power Pool’s vision for regional power trade.

Further progress in the power pooling initiatives was marked in the fourth quarter of 2011 when a substation linking Djibouti to the Ethiopian power grid was inaugurated.


There is need to end the Kenya Power monopoly- Tom Makau (Blogger)

As I write this, the social media is abuzz with Kenya Power customers venting their frustration at the electricity distributor over a message they sent to all their customers on prepaid meters. This message was on their intention to deduct 30 Kwh from their existing units loaded on their meters so as to recover a similar number of units that came pre-loaded in the meters during installation. The truth of the matter is no matter how vitriol their “tweets” towards Kenya power will be, It will go ahead and deduct the units from users’ meters and the users will still remain their customers.
After the break-up of the East African Community, the existing power company (East African Power and Lighting Company) broke up into three companies for Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania with the Kenyan one taking the name Kenya Power and Lighting Company (KPLC), KPLC was a vertically integrated entity responsible for the generation, transmission and distribution of electric power in the country. The Kenya electric power act of 1997 led to the breaking up of this vertical integration and three entities were formed, Kenya electricity generating company (Kengen) and Kenya Power and lighting company. The role of power generation was now moved to Kengen. The third unit was the Electricity Regulation Board which was a semi-autonomous regulator. This act also allowed the introduction of independent power producers (IPPs) who could now generate power and sale to KPLC at competitive rates to the government-owned Kengen. Subsequent acts of parliament such as the energy act of 2006 led to the refinement of the 1997 act and addition of the energy regulatory commission and the establishment of KETRACO (Kenya Electricity transmission company) which took over the role of electricity transmission from KPLC was further established. This left KPLC with only one role: that of distribution of electricity.
What all these acts have failed to do, is to open up the customer facing end of the whole electric power value chain to competition. KPLC which recently re-branded to Kenya power, still maintains the monopoly of electricity distribution in the country. The result is poor service delivery to option-less customers who have now resorted to social media to air their frustrations.
Kenya Power has been struggling with the billing and collection of post paid electricity consumption, the process was very labor intensive and led to negative cash flows. The adoption of prepaid meters transferred the meter reading and top up to the end-user hence saving on labor costs and at the same time instantly converted their cash flow into positive cash flow as users now pay before consumption. It’s the dream of any business to wield the powers to instantly convert cash flows that way.
With all this, I am of the opinion that the 2006 energy act needs to be repealed to allow competition on the electricity distribution front.
How will it happen? will Kenya Power competitors have to build parallel networks to supply electricity to end users?
The answer is No. what the government needs to do if change the law and make Kenya power an infrastructure provider and let it run the existing electricity network in a 50:50 partnership with private companies. It will then lease this network to several private/independent power utility companies that will buy electricity from Kengen and IPPs and pump it onto the network that they have leased from Kenya Power. end users can now chose which supplier they want to use (based on price, service delivery etc) and the install a meter from that company. They will now be topping up the meter with tokens bought from the meter supplier and hence effectively using their electricity. Users can therefore have several meters from different suppliers and switch across them depending on prevailing prices and tariff offers (Just like what is currently happening in the mobile sector). Because of the 50:50 partnership with a private player, Kenya power can upgrade this network and make it more resilient and less prone to failure/down times. While at it, they can also make it a smart grid.
How will the different “electricities” (for lack of a better word)  from the different power companies that run on the Kenya power cable be identified? This is easy to do, let each company add a low harmonic modulating carrier to the 50Hz supplied by Kengen and IPPs and then transmit it. This carrier tone can only be decoded by the correct meter and returned to the original 50Hz for use. In more familiar terms, it will work just the same way a Safaricom SIM card can only associate with the Safaricom network and not Orange or YU.
This approach will go a long way in introducing competition to the distribution end of the power supply chain, this competition will lead to improved service delivery to the consumers.
Courtesy of http://tommakau.com